Hamilton City Council Stormwater Bylaw

Page 1 of 4

Closes 9 Dec 2020

Feedback form

1. Which option do you prefer?

Click to review the issues and topics table

Issues Option One (proposed)
Amend the bylaw
Option Two
Do not amend the bylaw
Issue 1: Recognition of Relationship of Waikato Tainui with the River and the need to protect and restore the River

The current bylaw references the Waikato River Settlement Act 2010 and Vision and Strategy but does not fully acknowledge the relationship of Waikato Tainui with the river and does not reflect principles outlined in Council Policy.
Amend the bylaw to further recognise the Vision & Strategy and its objective of protecting and restoring the Waikato River (and associated Iwi Management Plans of Waikato Tainui and Ngaati Hauaa).
Proposed changes to the bylaw include:
• adding recognition of Waikato Tainui’s relationship with the River to the introduction;
• adding ‘restoration and protection of the Waikato River’ as a purpose of the bylaw;
• further controls on contaminant discharges;
• added requirements for reviewed Pollution Control Plans, and maintenance of devices.
No change to bylaw
No change to the bylaw means there is less recognition of the need to protect and restore the river through control on the stormwater network.
Issue 2: Connection Approvals

Increased urban development since 2015 means that Council needs stronger controls on connections to manage effects on the network and ensure compliance with Council’s stormwater discharge consent.
Amend the bylaw to strengthen recognition of the need for connections to be approved and to be aligned with Council’s Policy, Plans, water impact assessments and Citywide Stormwater Consent requirements.
Proposed changes to the bylaw include:
• adding clauses on requirement for connections approval;
• adding clauses that require compliance with catchment management plans, impact assessments, consent notices and stormwater discharge consent conditions;
• adding a clause that allows Council to impose consent conditions on an Approval;
• providing a process for issuing warnings for non-compliance with an Approval.
No change to bylaw
No change to the bylaw means less clarity to the public on how a development proposal will be managed.
Issue 3: Contaminant Controls on Pool Water and Building sites

Pool Water
There is an increasing number of pop-up pools in the City which are discharging chlorinated pool water to the stormwater network. Highly chlorinated water should not be going to the stormwater network.

Building Site Sediment
New growth areas with numerous building site activities could discharge high quantities of sediment to the network. The current bylaw and Building Code are weak in managing building site activities for sediment control.
Amend the bylaw to manage pool water discharges and building site sediment.
Proposed changes to the bylaw include:
• defining what cannot be discharged to the network;
• amending the bylaw to capture pool water discharges as being a breach, and directing the public on where pool water should be discharged;
• amending the bylaw to capture sediment from building activities as being a breach.

Education Strategy
Council proposes to support implementation of the bylaw by developing an education strategy, for the disposal of pool water. This could coincide with Smart Water campaigns about watering lawns.
No change to bylaw
Council would have to rely on other regulation such as the Tradewaste and Wastewater Bylaw, the Building Code and education.
Issue 4: Private Stormwater System Function and Maintenance

Hamilton is a high growth city and Council is increasingly relying on private stormwater systems to manage stormwater quality and quantity. Over time, Stormwater Management Device performance can diminish if not maintained.

The current bylaw does not clearly outline an owner’s responsibility for maintenance of a Device. Consent notices and Three Waters Practice notes provide limited direction and advice but are unlikely to be recognised when a property is on-sold.

The current Bylaw is silent on what a High-Risk Facility Pollution Control Plan should provide for and does not have the High Risk Facility Register attached as a Schedule for the Public’s easy reference.
Amend the bylaw to provide clarity to property owners or occupiers on maintenance responsibilities, provide Council the ability to direct what is required within a timeframe.
Proposed changes to the bylaw include:
• defining a Stormwater Management Device;
• amending the bylaw to give more clarity to property owners or occupiers on maintenance responsibilities and submission of as-builts to Council;
• adding new clauses to allow Council to direct what may be required for a private stormwater system and the timeframe that it must be done in;
• attaching the High-Risk Facility Register as Schedule One to the bylaw.

Education Strategy
Council proposes to develop an Education Strategy for Private Stormwater Devices to assist with understanding and maximise compliance.
No change to bylaw
Council would need to rely on consent notices, Three Waters Practice notes, Three Waters Connections Policy (for agreements), and Local Government Act provisions to enable Council to ‘fix’ damage.
An education strategy could be used to assist with understanding and maximise compliance.
Issue 5: Authority to ensure Private Stormwater Management Devices remain effective and cost recovery

In authorising land use consents, Council has a responsibility to monitor consent compliance and in doing so manage effects of landuse activities. There is a lack of clarity to the public on Council’s ability to access land to inspect devices, issue Defect Notices and carry out works if required.
Amend the bylaw to provide for Defect Notices for Private Stormwater Systems and therefore give Council the ability to carry out works and charge costs.
Proposed changes to the bylaw include:
• new clause to allow Council to issue Defect Notices if a Private Stormwater System is not functioning effectively.
No change to bylaw
Council would be in a weaker position to protect and restore the River.
Issue 6: Working in Close Proximity to Public Stormwater Infrastructure

The process for a building consent application does not address potential damage to Council infrastructure, including stormwater infrastructure. Council has an obligation to issue a building consent if it is satisfied that the provisions of the building code will be met even though there may be an existing infrastructure issue, such as a public drain.

The risk to Council is potential damage to infrastructure, inaccessibility to infrastructure and cost to Council to resolve the issue.
Option 1: Amend the bylaw to ensure protection of Council assets through requiring an application.
Proposed changes to the bylaw include:
• new clause to require an application to be made if working in close proximity to stormwater infrastructure;
• new clauses to require compliance with the Regional Infrastructure Technical Specifications and notification prior to building works.
Option 2: No change to bylaw
Council would need to rely on internal processes and changes to other regulatory mechanisms.
Issue 7: Making the bylaw easier to understand for the public

Bylaw compliance relies on clarity for the public and staff to enable easy interpretation of requirements and process, avoid misinterpretation issues, and improve efficiency in administering the bylaw.
Amend the bylaw with definitions, expanded clauses and advice notes.
Proposed changes to the bylaw include:
• new definitions for Occupier, Defect Notice, Council Policy, and Stormwater Management Device;
• a descriptive list of contaminants that cannot enter the network;
• expanded definitions for Ecological Device, High-Risk Facility, Overland Flow Path, Pollution Control Plan, Public Stormwater System and Private Stormwater System and Watercourse;
• new clause relating to excessive loads on the network causing damage, additional stormwater asset type (that should not be damaged) and clarity on what could constitute an obstruction; and
• provide for overland flow paths to be identified to the Public by Council resolution if not in a District Plan; and
• amendments to some clauses to ensure consistency with connection approval clauses in other bylaws (Water Supply Bylaw and Trade Waste and Wastewater Bylaw).
No change to bylaw
Council and the public would need to rely on the bylaw as it is currently written and interpret for the public.
2. Topics or areas relating to stormwater.

Regardless of whether you support option 1 or 2, an important part of implementing the bylaw is ensuring that people understand their obligations, and those of Council, under the Stormwater Bylaw. To help us do this well, Council wants to know the topics or areas relating to stormwater that our community would like a better understanding of.
Please list these below.

3. Do you have any supporting material or images to include as part of your feedback?

Warning: uploaded files as may be visible to the public as part of your submission response. Please ensure any file is virus-free, redacted and ready for publishing.

Please make sure your file is under 25MB
4. Would you like the opportunity to talk to us about your submission in person?
(Required)

Verbal submissions will likely take place in February 2021 and we will contact you to arrange a time.  Please give us your contact details in the next section.