Share your voice

Give feedback on an open consultation, find a past project we consulted on, or read about how we used your feedback.

Be part of the conversation and help us shape Hamilton.

Share your voice. Shape your city.

Open for feedback

Here’s what we did with your feedback

Here are some of the issues we have consulted on and their outcomes. See all outcomes

We asked

In October/November 2021, we asked the community if a safer speed area should be implemented in all residential streets within the Garnett Avenue area (Forest Lake). This would mean a speed limit change from 50kph to 40kph. The proposed change aligns with our Hamilton Speed Management Plan, which is about achieving safe and appropriate speeds to allow residential neighbourhoods to have a safe environment to live and play. Minor works were also proposed at key locations within this area to support the lower speed limit. The engagement was targeted to those who live in this area of Hamilton.

You said

We received 53 submissions and the majority of these responses supported the safer speed area proposal and the overall objective of making their neighbourhood safer for all road users to get around.

We did

The safer speed area, and change in speed limit to 40kph, for the Garnett Avenue Area in Forest Lake was approved via council resolution and will be implemented from May 2022.

We asked

In August 2021, Hamilton City Council underwent a wider representation review, following the decision in May 2021 to establish Maaori wards for the next two local government elections. We sought feedback over a six-week period on our initial proposal for wider representation arrangements. The review was done to ensure fair and effective representation for all Hamiltonians, in line with legislative requirements.

Our initial proposal was to:

  • Retain current general ward arrangement of six councillors elected in the East Ward, and six councillors elected in the West Ward.
  • Retain the mayor elected at-large.
  • Increase the total number of Councillors to 14.
  • Introduce one city-wide Maaori ward with two Maaori ward councillors.
  • Not introduce community boards.

You said

We received 451 submissions with a variety of views put forward.

  • 177 responses (39%) supported the initial proposal in its entirety.
  • 274 responses (61%) did not support the initial proposal in its entirety.
  • 12 people had their say at the Hearing and Engagement Committee meeting via zoom. 

The consultation asked submitters whether they supported the initial proposal or not, and why. There were four key components of the proposal, of which 3 out of 4 were supported by most of those who commented on them as below:

  1. Increase total number of Councillors to 14: Of the 296 who commented on this, 143 (48%) supported the proposed increase to 14 Councillors.
  2. Retain the current East/West general ward arrangements with 6 Councillors in each: Of the 175 who commented on this, 105 (60%) supported keeping the current East and West general wards.
  3. Introduce a city-wide Maaori ward with two Maaori ward Councillors: Of the 52 who commented on this, 41 (79%) supported a city-wide Maaori ward.
  4. No community boards: Of the 43 who commented on this, 27 respondents (63%) disagreed with the proposal and instead sought the introduction of community boards.

Many comments (over a third) were on topics out of scope for this consultation, particularly in relation to Maaori wards - a decision which has already been made. This has tended to slightly skew the ratio of support/non-support of the proposal. Therefore, it is important to note that:

  • 99 comments from the 274 submissions that did not support the initial proposal said this was because they did not support the introduction of Maaori wards.
  • If the submissions rejecting the proposal on these grounds are disregarded as out of scope, the balance of submissions for and against the initial proposal is closer to 50/50.
  • Several submissions also referenced inadequate levels of Maaori representation in general. However, the number of Maaori ward seats is determined by population proportion set by legislation.

We did

On 11 November, Councillors considered the public submissions and voted to approve the initial proposal as the final proposal for representation arrangements, adding two city-wide Maaori ward seats to the otherwise unchanged Council table.

This decision was publicly notified on 17 November.


The appeal period ran from 17 November to 17 December 2021.Appeals were forwarded to the Local Government Commission. The appeal hearing was held on 8 March 2022.  

The Commission determination endorsed Council’s initial proposal for representation, of six East Ward seats, six West Ward seats, and two Kirikiriroa Maaori Ward seats.

 These representation arrangements will come into effect for Hamilton’s 2022 local government elections.  

We asked

Under the Local Government Act 2002, it is a requirement that our Hamilton Traffic Bylaw be reviewed five years after its introduction. Our bylaw was due for review in 2021 and we proposed minor changes to support recent legislative changes and case law, technology advancements and increased clarity for ease of understanding. Hamiltonians were invited to share their thoughts on these proposed changes during August/September 2021.

You said

Of the 66 responses received, 63% (42 respondents) indicated they wished to retain the current bylaw and make minor amendments, and 37% (24 respondents) chose to retain the current bylaw with no amendments. The most common reasons for participants choosing to retain the current bylaw with minor amendments were the need to be adaptable/flexible as our community and way of transport changes; the need to include different modes of transport moving forward; and the need to have stronger enforcement of the bylaw rules.

We did

We updated our Hamilton Traffic Bylaw according to these proposed changes and the new bylaw was adopted in December 2021. A copy can be found online at